• Anthony Hourigan

Why Aren't Term Deposits Working Anymore?

The headline above is a very common question that I hear all too regularly. It’s usually followed with a question along the lines of: “is there a better alternative that I don’t know about?”. The short answer to this question is: yes. The purpose of this blog is to highlight and explain some other options available to investors that may be a more attractive alternative. As with everything there are pros and cons, and it is up to the individual investor to decide which is most appropriate for them.

We all know why term deposits are leaving investors / savers dissatisfied at present with record low interest rates, but let’s take it a little further and show what it actually means in real terms. A quick search of term deposits available in the current market tells me the highest interest rate I can get in a term deposit is about 2.05% p.a. for a 12-month deposit. In nice round numbers, if I stick $100,000 in that term deposit and redeem it one year later it will have returned $2,050. Pretty unimpressive.

The sad thing is, it’s even less impressive than that, for two main reasons: Consumer Price Index (CPI), commonly known as inflation; and tax.


In basic terms, CPI measures the movement of the cost of a basket of goods to the consumer, i.e. inflation. For the most recent quarter, inflation sits at 1.6% year-on-year. In practical terms, this means something that cost you $100 this time last year now costs you $101.60. This is nothing new, and the rate of inflation varies over time. The long-term inflation target of the RBA is between 2-3%.


There is tax owing on the $2,050 interest made in the term deposit that was tied up for 12 months, and the marginal rate of tax will vary between individuals. For illustration purposes, we’ll assume a marginal tax rate of 30%. So, on the $2,050 interest, you owe the ATO $615, leaving you $1,435.

Now to tie inflation and tax together to understand what your real rate of return is, i.e. how much more can I afford as a result of the investment?

The net return of $1,435 is equal to 1.435% and we know that inflation is running at 1.6%. Subtract inflation from your after-tax return and the best term deposit on the market has returned negative -0.165% over 12 months. That’s right. The real value of your investment, or ‘what can my capital + returns buy me now?’ has gone down! This is a new phenomenon for Australians, because interest rates have never been this low, but it is something that we need to address in terms of our own saving and investment.

The higher your tax rate, the worse this is. For example, if you’re in the top tax bracket paying 47% (including the Medicare levy), the returns are as follows: $2,050 minus $963.50 = after-tax return of $1,086.50 or 1.0865%. Factor in inflation of 1.6% and this is a negative return of -0.5135%.

No wonder investors are looking for alternatives!


Fortunately, there are several alternatives to term deposits, and in fact there are many more today than there were a couple of years ago. Many are listed, so being traded on the open market means they are not tied up for a predetermined period, like a term deposit for example. Furthermore, you are free to pull the investment at any time without penalty – just be aware you will have to pay execution costs.


One of the more widely used listed securities is the capital note, which is a hybrid security issued by institutions (for example banks) and pay a rate of return on face value. These securities pay dividends, known as coupons, usually including franking, which rank ahead of dividends on ordinary equities. That is, the institution must pay all capital note coupons before they can pay any dividends on ordinary equities. These instruments are typically far less volatile than the underlying equity of the institution issuing them. Their rate and frequency of interest payments is pre-determined by the issuer and is usually set at a rate over and above a benchmark. To illustrate how the instruments work in reality, we’ll look at the CBAPD (this is just the code that the instrument trades under on the ASX).

CBAPD is a capital note that was issued by Commonwealth Bank in September 2014. The bank set the interest payments on these instruments using the 3-Month Bank Bill Swap Rate, plus 2.8% p.a. paid quarterly. At the time of issue, in September 2014 the 3-Month BBSW was 2.7%, meaning the instrument was paying holders 5.5% p.a. paid quarterly. Setting the floating rate gives the issuer the flexibility to adjust payments in line with interest rates, and having the margin over-and-above gives the security holder the confidence that regardless of which way interest rates move, they will always receive more than the benchmark.

Fast forward to today, and as we all know, interest rates have moved south. At time of writing, the 3-Month BBSW is at 0.83%, meaning that this particular instrument is paying holders 3.63% p.a. (3-Month BBSW + 2.8%) for those holders who purchased at ‘face value’ i.e. $100. Because these instruments are listed, their prices will move up or down as traded on market to reflect what the market deems a fair yield. In the case of the CBAPD, it is currently trading at $101.43 which implies a yield of 3.58% if you purchase it at these levels. By comparison, in 2016 the price of CBAPD was pushed down to a low of $85.29 (when the 3-Month BBSW was at 2.28%). This had the effect of pushing the yield on CBAPD up to 5.96%.

Figure 1 below shows the relative performance of the CBAPD to Commonwealth Bank’s underlying (equity) share price since CBAPD has been listed. You can see the lack of volatility in the capital note versus the common equity. The trade-off is that the common equity pays a higher dividend (currently around 7.8% for CBA inclusive of franking), but in a market downturn you would expect the capital note not to move much, whereas the CBA shares would go down in value.

Figure 1: Share price movement of CBAPD Capital Note (purple) vs CBA equity (blue)

It’s important to remember that these capital notes have a maturity date – in the case of CBAPD, the maturity date is December 15th 2022. On this date, the securities will most likely be redeemed by the issuer at face value – i.e. $100. So if the security is trading well above or below face value, the investor should take note as to how that will affect their overall return if held to maturity. Example using rough numbers for illustration purposes:

A security trading at $105 with one year left to maturity, with a running yield of 5%, the investor can expect an overall return of zero if held to maturity. This is because they will receive interest payments (coupons) of 5%, however their $105 security will be redeemed for $100 crystalising a -5% return on the capital, thereby offsetting the 5% the investor received in income.

Conversely, if a security with one year left to maturity is trading at $97.09 with a running yield of 2%, then the investor can expect an overall return of +5% if held to maturity. The security is redeemed for $100 (+3% appreciation on capital) plus the 2% received in income.


More recently there have been a number of LITs come to market. In basic terms, the ones we look at below are trusts run by companies that lend to corporate borrowers. In recent times, as the banks have retreated from this space, companies like Partners Group and others have taken their place. Each of these will have its own investment objective, underlying investments, and nuances. Each should be researched thoroughly before considering making an investment. Figure 2 below outlines some examples of these that have listed in recent times, and their targeted rates of distribution. Note that because they trade on the listed market, the share price will determine the underlying yield (the higher the share price, the lower the yield & vice-versa), hence the difference between ‘distribution’ and ‘current yield’.

Figure 2: Listed Investment Trust Distributions and Current Yield

Most of these have been even less volatile than the bank capital notes. To give an idea, the below chart shows the performance of GCI, NBI and MXT over the last 12 months.

Figure 3: Relative performance of GCI, NBI and MXT (Listed Investment Trusts)

The most volatile has been NBI which has ranged between -4% and +4%. Over that time, it has paid distributions of 6.105% (assuming you bought in the IPO at $2 per unit). Keeping with that assumption of a $2 purchase price at IPO (which was in November 2018), the trust has given a Total Shareholder Return (TSR) of 10.105%, with NBI currently trading at $2.08. Had one have been opportunistic and purchased at $1.92 in January this year then the TSR is currently 13.3% over 10 months.

There will be more issuance in this space, with KKR – the US private equity firm – launching their Credit Income Fund in November. This vehicle (also a LIT) will invest in KKR’s Global Credit Opportunities Fund (GCOF) which lends to corporates predominantly in Europe and the US, with a track record of consistent, reliable returns to investors. The performance of GCOF’s strategy is ranked in the top 1% of High Yield Funds over 3, 5, 7 and 10 years (Source: eVestment Alliance). What is interesting about this fund, as opposed to some others in the space, is that KKR is able to draw on their decades of experience and intimate knowledge of corporates they are lending to, to form a deep understanding of the business.

Up until now, the fund has been unlisted, and with the Australian appetite for yield being unsatisfied elsewhere, there is plenty of demand for the listed KKR vehicle. The LIT is to be issued at a price of $2.50 per unit, which is the starting Net Asset Value (NAV). In other words, the issuer (KKR) is funding all listing costs – as did Partners Group when they recently listed their Global Income Fund. I would expect KKR to perform in a very similar way to PGG upon listing, i.e. up a small amount 2-3%, and continue to appreciate in value as the manager increases Net Asset Value.

There are a few other listed options in addition to those discussed above, including corporate bonds and Government bonds. At this point, there’s not a great deal of practical use in discussing them as the yields in most cases are significantly lower than what we’ve gone through thus far.


With the assumption that term deposits currently do not serve their purpose, investors need to think seriously about finding an alternative. To extract a higher yield, it is usually necessary to move up the risk curve and that is no different with bank capital notes, or Listed Investment Trusts. It comes down to each investor’s risk/reward profile. One thing is clear though – term deposits are going backwards in real terms in the current environment. Personally, that is a risk I will never take!

If you would like more information on any of the matters discussed here, please feel free to get in contact with us at info@cloudbreakwealth.com.au

General Advice Warning: Any advice given herein is general in nature and has not taken into consideration your personal financial objectives, situation or specific needs. You should consider the appropriateness of the advice as it relates to you before acting upon it. Where a specific product has been mentioned, you should always consult the Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) before making any investment decision relating to it.

156 views0 comments

29 Collins Street Kiama NSW 0429 336 616

Cloudbreak Wealth is a Corporate Authorised Representative of PGW Financial Services Pty Ltd AFSL: 384713

  • Facebook